Angry Earth

A group of top climatologists meeting in Paris, France have released a compelling report that officially puts the blame on humans for global warming. The scientists are 90% certain that we are to blame for increasing global temperatures and rising ocean levels. The most haunting aspect of the report states that global warming is a runaway process; there is nothing we can do to halt it. It is essentially like a large train with no brakes speeding down the tracks at 100mph and no one can stop it. What is worse, the climatologists believe that Earth’s median temperature will increase 3.5-7 degrees by 2100. When global temperature increases, ocean levels rise, which by 2100 may rise by 23 inches. This truly alarming report is an eye opener to what mankind is capable of doing; ruining our home.

Of course with any new report on global warming, many conservatives are going to allege that the idea of humans screwing the Earth up is not conceivable. I am not one to take such reports at face value, but I am alarmed by this latest premonition. Some would argue that this is just a natural Earth cycle and that this is just a warming cycle. But the evidence tells the tale for us in this particular case. How can anyone counter the fact that CO2 levels have rose exponentially since 1700; the eve of the Industrial Revolution? With more CO2 in the atmosphere, that means the sun’s rays are forever trapped in our atmosphere, hence warming the planet. One cannot forget the stunning pictures of ancient icebergs breaking off of glaciers due to the increased temperatures at both the extreme northern and southern latitudes.

The damage is already done; there isn’t anything we can do in the short term to repair what we have taken for granted. Obviously there are actions that can be taken to help lessen the severity of the onset of extreme global warming conditions. The U.S. and other industrialized countries are heading in the right direction in concern to lessening CO2 emissions. Following the Kyoto accords is vital in maintaining what we have now. Either way, the effects of global warming are more far reaching than we think. Coastal areas are especially vulnerable, as we have witnessed the last few years with the occurrence of countless intense hurricanes and typhoons. Cities like New Orleans that are already below sea level may have legendary status like the fabled lost island of Atlantis when our children grow older.

Super Sunday Mania

It is indeed that time of the year, the most prestigious sporting event ever crafted is upon us; the Super Bowl. Who knew that a simple game envisioned and named by Lamar Hunt in 1967, would pit the champion of the American Football Conference (then the AFL) and the National Football Conference (then the NFL) would turn out to be what it is today? The Super Bowl is the most watched TV program of the year, usually garnering 80-90 million viewers with over 140 million people world wide tuning in at some point in the game. Obviously, Americans are enamored with the Super Bowl and the events surrounding it for many reasons, mainly the simple fact that it is the middle of winter. What else do we have to do besides sit on our duffs stuffing our faces with Tostitos?

There is also the added bonus of viewing the countless new and highly “original” commercials. It is the only time of year when Americans are able to experience an onslaught of new material all at once and usually underscored by a comedic twist. Personally, I enjoy the Anheiser-Busch commercials. Who knew that beer would seem more tempting after watching a pilot jump out of an airplane without a parachute to retrieve a cold one? This year 30 second advertisements will cost companies roughly $3 million. Every year the cost goes up, as do tire sales. We even get to witness over 670 pounds of confetti fall from the sky after the winner of the game is decided. If you are lucky and have $5-10K to blow on a ticket, you get to witness it all in person. Hot damn!

Finally onto the most overlooked part of the Super Bowl, the game. The Colts are a 7 point favorite, which was bound to happen. But with the success of the AFC in the past 7 of 9 games, there is no doubt that those in Vegas are going to play it safe. But I believe that it should be a classic game of a high powered offense versus a powerful defense. We all know defense wins championships, so it is rather obvious where my allegiance lies. With all of the hype surrounding Peyton Manning, Rex Grossman has been severely overlooked. Grossman has had 7 games with a quarterback rating over 100. Guess who also had the same statistic? That’s right, Peyton Manning himself! As with any Bears game it is a matter of whether the good Rex Grossman shows up and if the defense plays like they are on a planet with less gravity, especially Brian Urlacher’s.

Flem’s Super Bowl Prediction: Colts 10, Bears 21

Is Vista the End All of Operating Systems?

Microsoft officially released Windows Vista yesterday, along with its new Office system. Most of the “tech crowd” is apprehensive about the new operating system and for good reason. Even though the OS is stable and has an assortment of new gadgets such as Aero Interface, which essentially streamlines the desktop allowing for a glass like appearance. But on the downside, the more technologically sound aspects of Vista are only included in the higher end versions, which comes with the added bonus of paying even more money ($649 for “ultimate”). The other added bonus included the one license that come with any version of Vista. This means that a user can install the product only once on one machine. For those of us who own more than one machine, looks like we are SOL.

Vista took roughly five years to be developed, which led many of us to expect more from Microsoft. The added features are new, but are comparable to what many have called “Windows XP service pack 3.” In sum, the new features are not exactly worth the added cost. Speaking of cost, Vista comes with the joy of having to upgrade your current machine. For example, let’s take a look at my machine. It is a solid machine as far as Windows XP is concerned: 3.2GHz P4 with HT, 1GB of single channel RAM, 160GB hard drive, 128MB ATI Radeon graphics card, and various other aspects. After running a variety of programs that tell a user whether they should upgrade, the results suggested that the “home basic” version was adequate for me, which does not have the new components advertized by Microsoft.

For users with baseline machines like mine, the cost of upgrading the hardware is monumental. To operate the “ultimate” edition, I’ll tell you exactly what you need: either a Pentium D or Duo Core processor, 2GB of memory, at least 40GB of hard drive space, and 256MB of graphics memory. This is a case of false advertisement if you ask me, but welcome to the world of IT. The basic consumer really does not have any of this, unless they have happened to spend a pretty penny on a new computer in the past few months. Dell is already marketing Vista basic and home editions with their new computers, which will open the market up for the new OS. But for those of us who do not need to upgrade, Windows XP will suffice or MAC OS 10.4, which is about the same thing as Vista.

Hitch-Up The Horses: Tehran Here We Come!

Over the past few days the world has not ceased to surprise anyone, much less myself. In the foreign arena, Iran has been a bit “busy.” The Pentagon is investigating the likely hood of an Iran connection to the January 20th attacks in Karbala, Iraq on a military compound. Five U.S. soldiers died in the attacks which were originally thought to have been the work of Iraqi insurgents. Yet, further review of the attacks suggests that Tehran may have been involved in the attacks. U.S. officials believe that the attacks were far too sophisticated for any Iraqi insurgent group to have carried out, which suggests that the Iranians were involved on some level. Iran is by far the most powerful nation in the Middle East with the most refined military capabilities, especially the Iranian Revolutionary Guard who are a highly trained military force similar to U.S. Special Forces.

If Iran is behind the U.S. deaths, there will be a good possibility the U.S. may aim to punish Tehran. A habitual ground war is not likely due the massive strain the U.S. military is under, but other options are available, including strikes on their nuclear facilities. Even though many of Iran’s nuclear facilities have been relocated underground since the international community has spoke out in defiance, the U.S. does have the capabilities to take out such subversive structures. But the downside is an attack on Iranian soil would disrupt the world’s oil supply, as they have the capabilities for an offensive within the Persian Gulf. If that were to occur, the price of oil could easily make it over $100 a barrel. Oil prices that high could quite literally leave the U.S. “high and dry.” The U.S. has moved more fire power to the Persian Gulf in the form of more warships in a show of force, signaling a possible strike.

Obviously, a military strike against Iran would not be a keen move right now. If we are drawn into a ground battle with the Iranians, we are going to be overwhelmed even more so than we are now. Congress and EU countries have suggested that the Bush Administration engage in diplomatic talks with Iran to work out an understanding. But the Bush Administration refuses to engage in talks with Tehran, which is rather typical of the president. His love of the status quo is even detrimental to his own war with Iraq. It is imperative that we deal with one rouge nation at a time; not the whole damn world at once. Never the less, it would be tidy to deal with the Iranians in specific concern to Iraq. Washington has been accusing Iran of training and arming Shiite insurgent groups, which is why diplomatic talks may facilitate better relations.

Is Restraint Plausible?

Democrats are considering a revision of the bill that allowed President Bush to go to war in 2002. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (the second ranking Democrat in the House) suggested the revision of the bill to allow more Congressional oversight and influence over presidential policy. Hoyer believes that a revision of the bill is quite plausible because the original language of the bill suggests that U.S. forces were to enter Iraq on a “nation building” mission; not conflict resolution. The solution in these terms would in theory arise out of military spending bills (the power of the purse) for military and diplomatic action in the war torn country.

If this bill is passed by Congress, there is no doubt that the president’s power will be curtailed in a policy making role. Even the president is in need of money these days. But restricting the president’s power as commander-in-chief is not a feasible option. Evidently, the Constitution does not allow for such actions. Congressional hearings about the U.S.’s actions in are to begin in haste. For the first time since 2003, the American public and Congress will finally receive some answers. If more detrimental information comes out of these hearings, there is a good chance that Congress will have more concrete evidence in which to restrain the president’s personal war in his sandcastle known as Iraq.

Stepping up diplomatic pressure on the Iraqi government is another vital part of this proposed bill. It is obvious to both the president and Congress that the Iraqis need to take over their own security operations. Their prime minister has promised more troops to the cause, but one has to question the commitment of the Iraqi people. Just like other human beings, people tend to become irritated when a bad situation does not change in due time. The status quo is not acceptable to those living through this atrocity, much less those with a comfortable view from 3000 miles away. I have stated the answer to this quandary countless time, but like most Americans whose opinions do not count to this administration, I have to ask this question instead: what’s the use?